Napoléon in Karikaturen und Guided Writing/Rating: Unterschied zwischen den Seiten

Aus ZUM-Unterrichten
(Unterschied zwischen Seiten)
Main>Ruffnek
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
(N)
 
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
Hallo liebe Schüler und Schülerinnen,
== Examples ==
die nächsten Wochen werden wir uns mit dem Thema '''Napoleon''' beschäftigen.
* [https://jsr-hersbruck.de/apps/englisch/example-1.html Reading Competition (Apr 2012)]
Ich hoffe es wird euch Spaß machen, die ausgesuchten Internetseiten durchzusehen und etwas über Napoleon und seine Zeit zu erfahren.
* [https://jsr-hersbruck.de/apps/englisch/example-2.html A film review: Twilight]
[[Bild:napoleon_bonaparte-1.jpg]]
* [https://jsr-hersbruck.de/apps/englisch/example-3.html Present one of your favourite books]
== Aufgabe ==
* [https://jsr-hersbruck.de/apps/englisch/example-4.html A Theatre Project]
Bitte seht euch die unterschiedlichen Seiten an, die unten aufgelistet sind. Dazu müsst ihr einfach nur auf eine der Zahlen klicken.  
Keine Angst! Ihr müsst nicht alles durchlesen, es geht nur darum, dass ihr eventuell ein Thema in den Seiten findet, was euch besonders interessiert. Dann können wir in der nächsten Stunde Gruppen einteilen, die dann jeweils Informationen zu ihrem gewählten Thema raussuchen. Dabei wird euch diese Seite dann natürlich wieder helfen.  
Ich habe euch schonmal je eine Seite zu einem bestimmten Thema ausgesucht, aber wenn ihr beim Stöbern etwas anderes findet, was euch mehr interessiert, dann sagt es mir einfach nächste Woche :-)
Allerdings können nicht nur "neue" Themen gemacht werden, bestimmte Themen müssen verteilt werden, aber das klären wir einfach nächste Woche alle zusammen.


== Seiten zum Durchgucken ==
* [http://www.historicum.net/themen/napoleon-bonaparte/]
* [http://www.napoleon-online.de/html/napoleon.html] (''Biographie'')
* [http://www.napoleon-online.de/]
* [http://www.napoleon-bonaparte.napoleon-online.de/] (''Napoleon privat'')
* [http://www.dieterwunderlich.de/Napoleon_russland_feldzug.htm] (''Russlandfeldzug'')
* [http://www.waterloo1815.de/] (''Die Schlacht bei Waterloo'')


== Fragen? ==
 
Falls ihr noch Fragen habt, bin ich bestimmt in der Schule zu finden, oder ihr fragt bei Frau Lammers-Koehrs nach. Oder ihr schreibt mir einfach eine Email: patricia.lorenz@uni-oldenburg.de
== Rating Scales ==
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! TASK ACHIEVEMENT (content) !! COHERENCE & COHESION (Organization, Linking) !! GRAMMAR<br> (Range, Accuracy) !! VOCABULARY<br> (Range, Accuracy)
|-
    <td style="background:#D4F69C">7</td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>all</b> content points included,</li>
        <li><b>most</b> content points fully elaborated</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li>ideas are organised <b>logically throughout the text</b></li>
        <li>uses a <b>number of appropriate</b> linking devices correctly</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>good range</b>, uses <b>some complex structures</b></li>
        <li>the <b>majority</b> of sentences are <b>error-free</b>; text contains only minimal errors that do not interfere with comprehension</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>good range</b>; varied formulation to avoid repetition</li>
        <li>the <b>majority</b> of sentences are <B>error-free</B>; text contains only <b>minimal errors</b> that do not interfere with comprehension</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C">6</td>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C" colspan="4">Some  features  of  7  and  some  features  of  5</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C">5</td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>all</b> content points included</li>
        <li><b>most</b> content points elaborated</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li>ideas are <b>generally well</b> organised</li>
        <li>uses uses <b>a number of basic but appropriate</b> linking devices correctly</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>sufficient range</b>, uses <b>simple structures</b> and also <b>attempts at more complex structures</b></li>
        <li>text contains occasional errors but it is clear what he/she is trying to express</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>sufficient range</b>; can express ideas effectively</li>
        <li>text contains <b>occasional errors</b> but it is clear what he/she is trying to express
</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C">4</td>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C" colspan="4">Some  features  of  5  and  some  features  of  3</td>
  </tr> 
 
  <tr>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C">3</td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>most</b> content points <b>included</b></li>
        <li>two content points elaborated</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li>ideas are <b>loosely</b> organised</li>
        <li>uses some basic linking devices; these may be repetitive</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>basic range</b>; uses <b>only simple structures</b></li>
        <li>text contains <b>frequent errors</b> that <b>can cause some difficulties</b> for the reader</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>basic range</b>, lexical gaps and repetition occur</li>
<li>text contains <b>frequent errors</b> that <b>can cause some difficulties</b> for the reader</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C">2</td>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C" colspan="4">Some  features  of  3  and  some  features  of  1</td>
  </tr>
 
  <tr>
    <td  style="background:#D4F69C">1</td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>most</b> content points are <b>omitted</b></li>
        <li><b>no elaboration</b> on points covered; there is <b>considerable irrelevance</b></li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li>there is a lack of organisation and linking devices</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>no range</b>, only <b>simple structures attempted</b></li>
        <li>text contains <b>frequent errors</b> that severely <b>distort</b> the meaning</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><b>no range</b>, vocabulary too basic to express ideas adequately</li>
        <li>text contains <b>frequent errors</b> that severely <b>distort</b> the meaning</li>
      </ul>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table> 
 
=== IMPRESSION OF GENERAL QUALITY: ===
* <b>2</b> Appropriate genre, format, style; text fulfils its purpose completely;
* <b>1</b> Few minor genre and/or format problems; length and/or style problems; text may not fully fulfil its purpose;
* <b>0</b> Several minor or major genre and/or format problems; length and/or style problems; text fails to fulfil its purpose;
 
 
 
{{Guided Writing}}

Aktuelle Version vom 12. März 2019, 01:38 Uhr

Examples


Rating Scales

TASK ACHIEVEMENT (content) COHERENCE & COHESION (Organization, Linking) GRAMMAR
(Range, Accuracy)
VOCABULARY
(Range, Accuracy)
7
  • all content points included,
  • most content points fully elaborated
  • ideas are organised logically throughout the text
  • uses a number of appropriate linking devices correctly
  • good range, uses some complex structures
  • the majority of sentences are error-free; text contains only minimal errors that do not interfere with comprehension
  • good range; varied formulation to avoid repetition
  • the majority of sentences are error-free; text contains only minimal errors that do not interfere with comprehension
6 Some features of 7 and some features of 5
5
  • all content points included
  • most content points elaborated
  • ideas are generally well organised
  • uses uses a number of basic but appropriate linking devices correctly
  • sufficient range, uses simple structures and also attempts at more complex structures
  • text contains occasional errors but it is clear what he/she is trying to express
  • sufficient range; can express ideas effectively
  • text contains occasional errors but it is clear what he/she is trying to express
4 Some features of 5 and some features of 3
3
  • most content points included
  • two content points elaborated
  • ideas are loosely organised
  • uses some basic linking devices; these may be repetitive
  • basic range; uses only simple structures
  • text contains frequent errors that can cause some difficulties for the reader
  • basic range, lexical gaps and repetition occur
  • text contains frequent errors that can cause some difficulties for the reader
2 Some features of 3 and some features of 1
1
  • most content points are omitted
  • no elaboration on points covered; there is considerable irrelevance
  • there is a lack of organisation and linking devices
  • no range, only simple structures attempted
  • text contains frequent errors that severely distort the meaning
  • no range, vocabulary too basic to express ideas adequately
  • text contains frequent errors that severely distort the meaning

IMPRESSION OF GENERAL QUALITY:

  • 2 Appropriate genre, format, style; text fulfils its purpose completely;
  • 1 Few minor genre and/or format problems; length and/or style problems; text may not fully fulfil its purpose;
  • 0 Several minor or major genre and/or format problems; length and/or style problems; text fails to fulfil its purpose;